With such a wide variety of running watches on the market I would say it is near impossible to make a choice.
I think I have narrowed it down to a couple.
Suunto appear to make nice watches which with their training effect mode appear to make getting your training level right a breeze this has led me to favour the T3 but is the T4 with it's coach mode a better option.
Or would Polar be the better route to go?
Any help greatly appreciated.
el-cheapo timex ironman for the stop watch and indiglo. they are attractive and comfortable and keep great time. it is just too bad they crap out after a year or two, but as disposable watches go they cant be beat. sorry this isn't helpful, it looks like you want a hear rate monitor. i have tried to use one, but cant get past the chest strap. it feels like wearing a sports bra
I just purchased a Polar FS1 and I love it (~60). My advice would have to be to get the watch that has the features that you will actually use - sure, I considered the over $200 model that will tell me how far I've gone, keep track of my heart rate at every moment, and tell me everything I could want to know about my workout, but I really wasn't going to keep track of all of that. In the end workout time and average heart rate were fine.
If you do go with a heart rate monitor there could be one thing to consider Polar over others (not that I have any experience with any other brands) - many fitness machines in gyms pick up on the Polar signal. Not a huge deal, but I was pleasantly surprised when it worked. Does anyone know if they work with other brands?
Does the Garmin work without a strap? Everything I have seen leads me to believe it is just the unit on your wrist (the Gramin 305). Is this accurate?
No, that's not right. The Garmin 305 includes a chest strap to monitor HR, just like the Polar and Timex HRM's do.
Check it:
Hi, I'm still very much a rookie when it comes to running. I was walking 11k last year, but decided to do more jogging this year instead.
I bought a Mio Sport by PhysiCal, sport watch. It has the stop watch feature, and you can take your HR by holding 2 fingers on the sensors any time during your workout. There is no chest strap, just the watch on your wrist. They are "supposed" to be quite accurate. Mine was under $100.
For what I'm doing, it's a good watch.
Just FYI because I happened to just notice this yesterday - the Garmin 305's are currently on sale at Amazon for only $217.99.
I recently bought a Polar T4 which is staight forward to use and set up and provides me with basic information, resting heart rate/ max/aver HR and time in zone. There are a couple of features is lacks
1. A stop watch with splits
2. back lighting when using in the dark.
The watch is compact which enable me to wear it all the time.
Okay i just had a great run 2.98 miles in hollywood, it's gonna be a Hot Friday!
A couple of questions from Ireland!
I notice no mention of the Nike Triax watches, is there a reason for this? I used to have one and really liked it, they are hard to get in Ireland.
Also I'm not sure of the benefit of a HRM. I enjoy running and getting splits, laps and being able to calculate my pace gives me all I need ... I think, unless I am missing something.
And finally, any suggestions for web sites to get good value in running watches?
Thanks
WRS
I have the suunto T3 and really like it. The training effect gives you a really good idea of how hard you're training which is more than a lot of watches out there. A bonus is it doesn't really look like a bulky running watch. I wear it as my everyday watch as well.
For anyone interested, I went on and bought a Suunot T3 after lengthy research!
So far I am very happy with it, I have used it for 5 training sessions so far, there is a number of things I am still getting used to, but overall it has lived up to expectations and seems like an excellent watch. I would be happy to review it after a couple of months use.
WRS
mrdavebach, i talked to a Garmin rep last weekend at the MCM Expo and he said that they will be coming out with an additional Forerunner model, but it will be smaller and more watch-like, but it will be a lower-end model, below the 205. I asked him specifically if the 305 would be getting replaced or upgraded soon and he said that there were no plans.
Maybe he was just trying to get me to buy the 305 right then, but i had no intentions of it anyway. Can anyone else confirm either way about Garmin's near-future product line?
Just a note on the Triax watchs - they are very good. I may have killed mine by dropping it on its side (waiting on the repairer to come back to me) but I had it for nearly 9 years prior.
I would say that you DO pay extra for the Nike branding and the latest models are less easy to read than the originals were.
I like my HRM and my timer separate so I had my Triax and a Polar unit. The new soft chest bands are much nicer than the old rigid plastic BUT they do not do well if you swim in them.
I have 2 old Timex and Casio watches, that are very simple, but wih efficient lap-cronometer, what most of the time is enough for my trainning. I also have a Oregon HR102, what is a very cheap heart monitor, but that works pretty well. I do't use it frequently because I dont fell confortable using chest strap. Recently I bought a Nike triax, the one I'm using most for trainning and racing. There is a interval feature that I rarely use. I can save up to 10 trainnings, detailing each lap and average.
Garmin and Suunto produce high level watches, including models with GPS, huge databank, several resources for trainning planning and evaluation. But for me, the ones I have are enough.
Which watch has the largest display? My eyes ain't what they use to be (I have to put on reading glasses to see my current watch). Any recommendations on a very basic (time / stopwatch / lap / alarm) watch for those of us who can no longer read the microdisplay and microprinting on the new fancy watches?
Thanks!
Jay
1 to 32 of 32